Translation in progress, please wait some minutes

RTX 4090 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell - GPU Benchmark Comparison

Direct performance comparison between the RTX 4090 and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell across 27 standardized AI benchmarks collected from our production fleet. Testing shows the RTX 4090 winning 6 out of 27 benchmarks (22% win rate), while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell wins 21 tests. All benchmark results are automatically gathered from active rental servers, providing real-world performance data.

vLLM High-Throughput Inference: RTX 4090 84% slower

For production API servers and multi-agent AI systems running multiple concurrent requests, the RTX 4090 is 84% slower than the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell (median across 3 benchmarks). For nvidia/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-FP8, the RTX 4090 reaches 645 tokens/s while RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell achieves 4124 tokens/s (84% slower). The RTX 4090 wins none out of 3 high-throughput tests, making the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell better suited for production API workloads.

Ollama Single-User Inference: RTX 4090 27% slower

For personal AI assistants and local development with one request at a time, the RTX 4090 is 27% slower than the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell (median across 8 benchmarks). Running deepseek-r1:32b, the RTX 4090 generates 45 tokens/s while RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell achieves 67 tokens/s (33% slower). The RTX 4090 wins 1 out of 8 single-user tests, making the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell the better choice for local AI development.

Image Generation: RTX 4090 58% slower

For Stable Diffusion, SDXL, and Flux workloads, the RTX 4090 is 58% slower than the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell (median across 12 benchmarks). Testing sd3.5-medium, the RTX 4090 completes at 28 s/image while RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell achieves 3.5 s/image (87% slower). The RTX 4090 wins 4 out of 12 image generation tests, making the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell the better choice for Stable Diffusion workloads.

Vision AI: RTX 4090 47% lower throughput

For high-concurrency vision workloads (16-64 parallel requests), the RTX 4090 delivers 47% lower throughput than the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell (median across 2 benchmarks). Testing llava-1.5-7b, the RTX 4090 processes 217 images/min while RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell achieves 442 images/min (51% slower). The RTX 4090 wins none out of 2 vision tests, making the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell the better choice for high-throughput vision AI workloads.

Ordenar un servidor con GPU RTX 4090 Todos los benchmarks de servidores con GPU

Rendimiento:
Más lento Más rápido
+XX% Mejor rendimiento   -XX% Rendimiento peor
Loading...

Cargando datos de referencia...

About These Benchmarks of RTX 4090 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell

Our benchmarks are collected automatically from servers having GPUs of type RTX 4090 and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell in our fleet. Unlike synthetic lab tests, these results come from real production servers handling actual AI workloads - giving you transparent, real-world performance data.

Pruebas de inferencia para modelos de lenguaje grande

We test both vLLM (High-Throughput) and Ollama (Single-User) frameworks. vLLM benchmarks show how RTX 4090 and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell perform with 16-64 concurrent requests - perfect for production chatbots, multi-agent AI systems, and API servers. Ollama benchmarks measure single-request speed for personal AI assistants and local development. Models tested include Llama 3.1, Qwen3, DeepSeek-R1, and more.

Pruebas de rendimiento en generación de imágenes

Image generation benchmarks cover Flux, SDXL, and SD3.5 architectures. That's critical for AI art generation, design prototyping, and creative applications. Focus on single prompt generation speed to understand how RTX 4090 and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell handle your image workloads.

Pruebas de rendimiento en IA Visual

Vision benchmarks test multimodal and document processing with high concurrent load (16-64 parallel requests) using real-world test data. LLaVA 1.5 7B (7B parameter Vision-Language Model) analyzes a photograph of an elderly woman in a flower field with a golden retriever, testing scene understanding and visual reasoning at batch size 32 to report images per minute. TrOCR-base (334M parameter OCR model) processes 2,750 pages of Shakespeare's Hamlet scanned from historical books with period typography at batch size 16, measuring pages per minute for document digitization. See how RTX 4090 and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell handle production-scale visual AI workloads - critical for content moderation, document processing, and automated image analysis.

Rendimiento del sistema

También incluimos el poder de cómputo del CPU (que afecta la tokenización y preprocesamiento) y las velocidades de almacenamiento NVMe (críticas para cargar modelos grandes y conjuntos de datos) – la visión completa para sus cargas de trabajo de IA.

Puntuación en TAIFlops

The TAIFlops (Trooper AI FLOPS) score shown in the first row combines all AI benchmark results into a single number. Using the RTX 3090 as baseline (100 TAIFlops), this score instantly tells you how RTX 4090 and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell compare overall for AI workloads. Learn more about TAIFlops →

Nota: Los resultados pueden variar según la carga del sistema y su configuración. Estos benchmarks representan valores medios de múltiples ejecuciones de prueba.

Order a GPU Server with RTX 4090 Order a GPU Server with RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell View All Benchmarks