Translation in progress, please wait some minutes

A100 vs RTX 4090 Pro - GPU Benchmark Comparison

Direct performance comparison between the A100 and RTX 4090 Pro across 26 standardized AI benchmarks collected from our production fleet. Testing shows the A100 winning 11 out of 26 benchmarks (42% win rate), while the RTX 4090 Pro wins 15 tests. All benchmark results are automatically gathered from active rental servers, providing real-world performance data.

vLLM High-Throughput Inference: A100 35% slower

For production API servers and multi-agent AI systems running multiple concurrent requests, the A100 is 35% slower than the RTX 4090 Pro (median across 2 benchmarks). For Qwen/Qwen3-8B, the A100 reaches 550 tokens/s while RTX 4090 Pro achieves 810 tokens/s (32% slower). The A100 wins none out of 2 high-throughput tests, making the RTX 4090 Pro better suited for production API workloads.

Inferencia de usuario único en Ollama: rendimiento aproximadamente igual para el A100

For personal AI assistants and local development with one request at a time, both the A100 and RTX 4090 Pro deliver nearly identical response times across 8 Ollama benchmarks. Running llama3.1:8b-instruct-q8_0, the A100 generates 124 tokens/s vs RTX 4090 Pro's 108 tokens/s (15% faster). The A100 wins 1 out of 8 single-user tests, making the RTX 4090 Pro the better choice for local AI development.

Image Generation: A100 roughly equal performance

For Stable Diffusion, SDXL, and Flux workloads, both the A100 and RTX 4090 Pro perform nearly identically across 12 benchmarks. Testing sd3.5-medium, the A100 completes at 8.9 images/min while RTX 4090 Pro achieves 9.7 images/min (8% slower). The A100 wins 6 out of 12 image generation tests, showing both GPUs are equally suitable for image generation.

Vision AI: A100 roughly equal throughput

For high-concurrency vision workloads (16-64 parallel requests), both the A100 and RTX 4090 Pro deliver nearly identical throughput across 2 benchmarks. Testing llava-1.5-7b, the A100 processes 282 images/min vs RTX 4090 Pro's 266 images/min (6% faster). The A100 wins 1 out of 2 vision tests, showing both GPUs handle production vision workloads equally well.

Ordenar un servidor GPU con A100 Todos los benchmarks de servidores GPU

Rendimiento:
Más lento Más rápido
+XX% Mejor rendimiento   -XX% Rendimiento peor
Loading...

Cargando datos de referencia...

About These Benchmarks of A100 vs RTX 4090 Pro

Our benchmarks are collected automatically from servers having GPUs of type A100 and RTX 4090 Pro in our fleet. Unlike synthetic lab tests, these results come from real production servers handling actual AI workloads - giving you transparent, real-world performance data.

Pruebas de inferencia para modelos de lenguaje grande

We test both vLLM (High-Throughput) and Ollama (Single-User) frameworks. vLLM benchmarks show how A100 and RTX 4090 Pro perform with 16-64 concurrent requests - perfect for production chatbots, multi-agent AI systems, and API servers. Ollama benchmarks measure single-request speed for personal AI assistants and local development. Models tested include Llama 3.1, Qwen3, DeepSeek-R1, and more.

Pruebas de rendimiento en generación de imágenes

Image generation benchmarks cover Flux, SDXL, and SD3.5 architectures. That's critical for AI art generation, design prototyping, and creative applications. Focus on single prompt generation speed to understand how A100 and RTX 4090 Pro handle your image workloads.

Pruebas de rendimiento en IA Visual

Vision benchmarks test multimodal and document processing with high concurrent load (16-64 parallel requests) using real-world test data. LLaVA 1.5 7B (7B parameter Vision-Language Model) analyzes a photograph of an elderly woman in a flower field with a golden retriever, testing scene understanding and visual reasoning at batch size 32 to report images per minute. TrOCR-base (334M parameter OCR model) processes 2,750 pages of Shakespeare's Hamlet scanned from historical books with period typography at batch size 16, measuring pages per minute for document digitization. See how A100 and RTX 4090 Pro handle production-scale visual AI workloads - critical for content moderation, document processing, and automated image analysis.

Rendimiento del sistema

También incluimos el poder de cómputo del CPU (que afecta la tokenización y preprocesamiento) y las velocidades de almacenamiento NVMe (críticas para cargar modelos grandes y conjuntos de datos) – la visión completa para sus cargas de trabajo de IA.

Puntuación en TAIFlops

The TAIFlops (Trooper AI FLOPS) score shown in the first row combines all AI benchmark results into a single number. Using the RTX 3090 as baseline (100 TAIFlops), this score instantly tells you how A100 and RTX 4090 Pro compare overall for AI workloads. Learn more about TAIFlops →

Nota: Los resultados pueden variar según la carga del sistema y su configuración. Estos benchmarks representan valores medios de múltiples ejecuciones de prueba.

Order a GPU Server with A100 Order a GPU Server with RTX 4090 Pro View All Benchmarks